love

Author Topic: Write about the last movie you watched (2006-2010)  (Read 3961576 times)

oldkid

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 18698
  • Hi there! Feed me worlds!
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20010 on: September 21, 2009, 01:36:59 AM »
Melville

Hehe.

Okay, carry on.

pixote

Dang.  I was going to fix that.  Can we just call him Herman from now on?
"It's not art unless it has the potential to be a disaster." Bansky

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 33723
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20011 on: September 21, 2009, 01:38:48 AM »
"Safe sucked.  It was so boring."
"It was supposed to be boring.  That's the whole point."
"Was it supposed to suck, too?  Because it totally sucked."
"How can you say it sucked when it totally did what it set out to do?"
"To bore the shit out of me?"
"Exactly!"
"Give me back my Twizzlers."

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

Melvil

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 9977
  • Eek
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20012 on: September 21, 2009, 01:40:50 AM »
But his rage and disgust isn't at anything going on in the film, but at the filmmaking process.  I don't think that's what GVS was going for, or a response he would appreciate.

I had to step back, Melville, before I responded to your review, because my initial response was anger and disgust to your review.  I know that you have excellent opinions on movies in general (anyone who likes Spirited Away as much as you do obviously has excellent taste), but it seemed that you completely missed the point of Elephant.

 I thought it was an excellently made film, taking me where it wanted me to go, lulling me with the boring events going through the maze of halls and classrooms of this quiet high school.  We see things from different perspectives all throughout the movie, and even though we know what's going to happen it still shocks and horrifies us-- perhaps because it was all TOO normal, too peaceful, too boring.  The complacency we felt is jarred, and our world is not the same.  Is this a perfect film?  No, but it is marvelous, and the acting isn't great, but real life isn't about great acting-- real life is full of terrible acting.  And by the end, this was MY high school and this event was happening where I lived.

Yet, I recognize that this was my personal experience of the film, and it is wrong for me to not allow you your own response to the film.  So, you were disgusted by the film making.  I don't understand that, but it's your opinion and so I respect it.  And you are a person who deserves respect.  But you are so wrong.

Thanks Steve, I appreciate the kind words despite vehemently disagreeing with me. :) It basically comes down to that I was not shocked and horrified at all by what happens. It was too artificial and I was too aware of Van Sants directorial choices to be affected. That's what made me angry, because in this movie of all movies I should have been emotionally invested. I had a similar reaction to Paranoid Park, so I shouldn't be surprised by this, but it's the amount that I love the idea of both movies that ultimately makes me as angry as I am that they don't work for me.

flieger

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 0
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20013 on: September 21, 2009, 01:43:44 AM »
Can I just say that I'm loving the discussion? Clarifying a lot of things for me.  :)

oldkid

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 18698
  • Hi there! Feed me worlds!
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20014 on: September 21, 2009, 01:44:23 AM »
The point Keith was making, and I agree with, is that his experimental films are pure Rorshach. They tell us more about ourselves than any narrative details. Some will watch Elephant and find his exploitation of stereotypes repulsive while others will think he is showing possible motives for the violence. The film splits its audience into the two camps which already exist. This is not a failure of the film but its success.

I think we understood Keith's point, and I'm not sure what I think of it, myself.  I just purchased the DVD, so I probably will watch it again soon and chime in on this.  But, again, I think that Melvil's  (check spelling... got it) is outside of what Keith is speaking of.  It is not disgust at the point of what GVS is supposed to be making, but disgust that there is no point at all.  This response tells Melvil nothing about himself-- except his blindness at being unable to see what a fantastic film this is.  If he had been angry at GVS at a message or a moral lapse, then it would support Keith's interpretation.  But for M to say "it's poor film making" is to say there IS no moral point, there is nothing to make a point from.  And then, if GVS is intending to stir an artistic reaction to the film, he failed in Melvil's case.
"It's not art unless it has the potential to be a disaster." Bansky

oldkid

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 18698
  • Hi there! Feed me worlds!
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20015 on: September 21, 2009, 01:46:55 AM »

Thanks Steve, I appreciate the kind words despite vehemently disagreeing with me. :) It basically comes down to that I was not shocked and horrified at all by what happens. It was too artificial and I was too aware of Van Sants directorial choices to be affected. That's what made me angry, because in this movie of all movies I should have been emotionally invested. I had a similar reaction to Paranoid Park, so I shouldn't be surprised by this, but it's the amount that I love the idea of both movies that ultimately makes me as angry as I am that they don't work for me.

Whew!  That's the kind of response I was hoping for.

But, you have to admit, Elephant must be effective in some way, because we are all spending so much effort talking about it.  If nothing else, it is not a neutral film.
"It's not art unless it has the potential to be a disaster." Bansky

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 33723
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20016 on: September 21, 2009, 01:49:10 AM »
But, you have to admit, Elephant must be effective in some way, because we are all spending so much effort talking about it.
The Hannah Montana: The Movie thread contains 121 posts, so I assume that's a more effective movie.  :D

I'm no help here at all.

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

Melvil

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 9977
  • Eek
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20017 on: September 21, 2009, 01:58:00 AM »
But, you have to admit, Elephant must be effective in some way, because we are all spending so much effort talking about it.  If nothing else, it is not a neutral film.

Yeah, I guess that's...something. :)

Clovis8

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 11720
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20018 on: September 21, 2009, 01:58:06 AM »
The point Keith was making, and I agree with, is that his experimental films are pure Rorshach. They tell us more about ourselves than any narrative details. Some will watch Elephant and find his exploitation of stereotypes repulsive while others will think he is showing possible motives for the violence. The film splits its audience into the two camps which already exist. This is not a failure of the film but its success.

I think we understood Keith's point, and I'm not sure what I think of it, myself.  I just purchased the DVD, so I probably will watch it again soon and chime in on this.  But, again, I think that Melvil's  (check spelling... got it) is outside of what Keith is speaking of.  It is not disgust at the point of what GVS is supposed to be making, but disgust that there is no point at all.  This response tells Melvil nothing about himself-- except his blindness at being unable to see what a fantastic film this is.  If he had been angry at GVS at a message or a moral lapse, then it would support Keith's interpretation.  But for M to say "it's poor film making" is to say there IS no moral point, there is nothing to make a point from.  And then, if GVS is intending to stir an artistic reaction to the film, he failed in Melvil's case.

I think we need to look at his experimental films differently than other films. The story/narrative is almost irrelevant (Gerry being a prime example of this). These films are all about the meta and subtext. Therefore, commenting that someone hated the parade of stereotypes means the film is succeeding on some level. Failure here is, in fact, success!

Part of this subtext comes from the fact that he roots his experimental films in a well known cultural milieu (school shootings, Kurt Cobain). We all bring so much shared baggage to the film they do not need a deep narrative.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2009, 02:01:21 AM by Clovis8 »

oldkid

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 18698
  • Hi there! Feed me worlds!
Re: Write about the last movie you watched
« Reply #20019 on: September 21, 2009, 02:01:42 AM »
But, you have to admit, Elephant must be effective in some way, because we are all spending so much effort talking about it.
The Hannah Montana: The Movie thread contains 121 posts, so I assume that's a more effective movie.  :D

I'm no help here at all.

pixote

Pix, Chaos Jedi
"It's not art unless it has the potential to be a disaster." Bansky

 

love