For me, it's less about being concerned on whether or not others on the forum think I'm not a very good writer, but more about whether or not I can adequately contribute to the forum through my reviews. My reviews are pretty much always personal, or this is what moved me, this is what I didn't like, and that has been expressed in the past by some forum members as not being "good" reviews. Personally, I never read a review from someone and think "Man, that was badly written." I try and figure out what compelled this person to write the review, do I agree or disagree with their take on the film, if I haven't seen this film, does this make me want to see the film now. So, it's less about caring if you like or don't like my writing, it's more about whether my review actually has an impact on someone or if it is contributing to the forum as a whole. Like I said before, I write scientifically, which means, what is the most succinct way to effectively convey my point. I am a great editor when it comes to reading scientific manuscripts, I can cut and slash all of the "flowery" writing out of it to make it clear and concise. Does that translate into critical film reviews? Maybe, maybe not. I won't know if I don't write more, which I constantly think I should.