I'm with Martin re Planet of the Apes, but then again I am also older and have a different sense of aesthetic. I was 7 when Star Wars came out, and I made my dad take me to see it in the theater 3 times during its run. Keep in mind that I lived in a small midwestern town with a single screen balconied theater, literally on Main Street, and no cable TV or VCRs until I was about 10.. As such, I find a lot of the CGI-heavy action fare (e.g., the entire Marvel universe) to be weightless and underwhelming, and having recently watched the De Palma doc, he made an observation about the production of these kinds of films that may explain why: a lot of these action sequences are "previsualized" by the people who know he technology, rather than the director or cinematographer, which is why they tend to look so generic, so video-gamish, as opposed to cinematic.* That said, I think the contemporary Apes movies do a very good job with the closeup non-action CGI work; it's just the storytelling, dialogue, etc. that I've never been that impressed with (above average, nothing more).
(*I realize that for those who are 7+ years younger than me, "video-gamish" may be the new "cinematic" aesthetic.)