love

Author Topic: 1990s US Bracket: Verdicts  (Read 712389 times)

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 34237
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #440 on: May 14, 2008, 11:47:13 AM »
Hentai, really?

This should be our next marathon.

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

ˇKeith!

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 26774
  • Bitch, I been around since LimeWire.
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #441 on: May 14, 2008, 11:58:24 AM »
Have to get that as an option on the next "which marathon next" poll.  hearing the adam & matty's in depth analysis would be gold.

roujin

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 15508
  • it's all research
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #442 on: May 14, 2008, 12:01:39 PM »
Hentai, really?

This should be our next marathon.

pixote

This made me laugh more than it should've.

edgar00

  • 00 Agent
  • Objectively Awesome
  • *
  • Posts: 12131
  • corndogs are better than Die Another Day
    • Between The Seats
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #443 on: May 14, 2008, 01:29:24 PM »
Forgive me for appearing like a bafoon, but what is Hentai?
-Le Chiffre: You changed your shirt, Mr Bond. I hope our little game isn't causing you to perspire.

-James Bond: A little. But I won't consider myself to be in trouble until I start weeping blood.

https://twitter.com/Betweentheseats
http://crabkeyheadquarters.wordpress.com/

facedad

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 10983
  • World Phucking Champions.
    • Be my netflix friend
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #444 on: May 14, 2008, 01:53:38 PM »
Forgive me for appearing like a bafoon, but what is Hentai?
Pretend you didn't ask and don't wait for an answer.
You're just jealous! Nobody loves you because you're tiny and made of meat!

https://twitter.com/thefaceboy

http://www.thereelists.com

roujin

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 15508
  • it's all research
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #445 on: May 14, 2008, 02:00:03 PM »
Forgive me for appearing like a bafoon, but what is Hentai?
Pretend you didn't ask and don't wait for an answer.

Yeah, seriously.

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 34237
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #446 on: May 14, 2008, 08:45:47 PM »

Husband and Wives  (Woody Allen, 1992)

Woody Allen is married to Mia Farrow.  Judy Davis is married to Sydney Pollack.  They're all best friends.  Heading out to dinner one night, Davis and Pollack casually announce that they're separating.  Allen and Farrow are all, "Whaa?"  Then everyone takes a long, hard look at themselves.  The end.

Husbands and Wives does not open well.  For one thing, the arc of the film is disappointingly obvious from the start (Pollack and Davis end up back together; Allen and Farrow drift apart).  Worse than that, the film is so anxious to demonstrate that it's going for a documentary style that it completely oversells the idea.  Carlo Di Palma's jittery camera careens about so amateurishly in the first scene as to be absurd.  There's zero realism to the photorealism, and it's really off-putting.

The cinematography settles down as the film progresses, but the nonfiction trappings rarely rise above the level of a half-baked conceit.  The film does use one aspect of the style to real advantage, though: The one-on-one interviews with the characters are generally excellent.  Allen writes a very good monologue, and the actors here make the most of these scenes.  I especially enjoyed Benno Schmidt's seemingly incongruous appearances as the ex-husband of Farrow's character.  Very nice contrast, there.

I glanced at a few reviews that lumped the film's editing together negatively with the film's camerawork.  I totally disagree with that.  Susan Morse's cutting was a huge asset here, with most every jump-cut being well-timed and good for either a smile or a key dramatic emphasis.  The transitions in and out of the interviews are great, and the film flows nicely overall, despite a couple fat scenes here and there.

On the whole, though, the film was just so-so for me.  Not many bad scenes, but not many great scenes.  Some nicely observed writing, but also some overly broad writing.  I did make it through the whole film without once thinking of Soon-yi Previn, however, so I'm grateful to myself for that.


Fast, Cheap & Out of Control  (Errol Morris, 1997)

Clowns?  I had no idea I was signing up for clowns.  Wtf, why didn't someone warn me?  I thought we were friends.

It's hard for me to remember what else this film was about.  Those brief moments of clown terror really overshadow everything.  Wait, it's coming back to me.  There was a wild animal trainer and a robot scientist and a topiary gardener and a mole-rat expert.  They said stuff into the camera.  Then there was a bunch of pretty (terrifying) circus B-roll shot by the awesome Robert Richardson.  Oh, and there were fantastic excerpts from some ridiculous old movie serials produced by Republic and Universal Studios.  And the music, I can't forget the music — a relentless, propulsively meditative score by Caleb Sampson.

Those were all the elements, I think.  Then some noble editors mixed them all together and a documentary was born.  And that resulting film is never boring.  There's always something interesting going on, either visually, sonically, or philosophically.  In a way, though, it's the kind of film where you get out whatever you yourself put in.  Morris makes a few loose connections here and there, but you could write fifty different papers about the "core idea" of the film — personal obsession, God in the modern world, man vs. nature, evolution, etc. — and all fifty could be perfectly valid.

That's not a criticism, by the way.  I dig that sort of thing.  It's sort of the documentary equivalent of a film like Mulholland Dr — you don't have to 'get' it, you can just enjoy letting it wash over you.  And that's pretty much how I viewed Fast, Cheap & Out of Control.  About half way through, I gave up trying to tease out a thesis and just savored the individual elements.  I would have preferred to have a few more personal epiphanies, but I didn't let their absence discourage me too much.

Glancing at reviews, I saw some suggestion that Morris is making fun of his characters.  I didn't see that at all.  However, I should say something more negative here because I haven't made it clear that I was actually kind of disappointed in the film.  Was it just the clowns?  No, there was something else... Well, I guess it all goes back to the idea that the film never quite coheres, except tonally.  And Morris never quite gets as much out of the topiary gardener and the mole-rat expert as he does the robot scientist and the wild animal trainer.  That's understandable, in a way — robots and the big top are much more interesting, visually, than static topiary bushes and ugly rodents scurrying through plastic tubes — but it's one more aspect that keeps the film from feeling fully formed.

Verdict:  Husbands and Wives ekes out a B-, while Fast, Cheap & Out of Control nets a strong B with good potential for improvement on a second viewing.  And another documentary moves on to round two.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2010, 03:29:44 PM by pixote »
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

edgar00

  • 00 Agent
  • Objectively Awesome
  • *
  • Posts: 12131
  • corndogs are better than Die Another Day
    • Between The Seats
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #447 on: May 14, 2008, 09:37:20 PM »
Forgive me for appearing like a bafoon, but what is Hentai?
Pretend you didn't ask and don't wait for an answer.

Yeah, seriously.

Very well then. Point taken.
-Le Chiffre: You changed your shirt, Mr Bond. I hope our little game isn't causing you to perspire.

-James Bond: A little. But I won't consider myself to be in trouble until I start weeping blood.

https://twitter.com/Betweentheseats
http://crabkeyheadquarters.wordpress.com/

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 34237
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #448 on: May 14, 2008, 11:58:20 PM »
No faceboy stamp of (dis)approval?

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

facedad

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 10983
  • World Phucking Champions.
    • Be my netflix friend
Re: 1990s US Bracket commentary
« Reply #449 on: May 14, 2008, 11:59:49 PM »
No faceboy stamp of (dis)approval?

pixote
Seen neither, have no opinion.
You're just jealous! Nobody loves you because you're tiny and made of meat!

https://twitter.com/thefaceboy

http://www.thereelists.com