Author Topic: meta  (Read 116362 times)

Clovis8

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 11719
Re: meta
« Reply #600 on: February 28, 2011, 09:44:23 PM »
Stats for February:

New topics: 95 --> the least since September 2007

New posts: 8914 --> the least since June 2008

Since July 2008 we have always gone past 100 new topics or 10000 new posts.


a lot of this is our stability issues I think.

oldkid

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 19044
  • Hi there! Feed me worlds!
Re: meta
« Reply #601 on: February 28, 2011, 11:54:40 PM »
At least some of this has to do with the changes trying to stabilize the forum.  Very busy threads have disappeared and some threads have been exchanged for less busy ones.  I know for me, some threads I was on regularly got restarted and I hadn't found the new ones until this week.
"It's not art unless it has the potential to be a disaster." Bansky

Dave the Necrobumper

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 12730
  • If I keep digging maybe I will get out of this hol
Re: meta
« Reply #602 on: March 01, 2011, 03:27:22 AM »
Also lately there seems to have been less posting in general, particularly in the Last Movie you Watched thread.

FLYmeatwad

  • An Acronym
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 28785
  • I am trying to impress myself. I have yet to do it
    • Processed Grass
Re: meta
« Reply #603 on: March 12, 2011, 03:19:20 PM »
Writing a paper on feminism as Bailey discusses our patriarchal society in The Suite Life On Deck. It's time to take a break and finish this paper tomorrow.

1SO

  • FAB
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 36128
  • Marathon Man
Re: meta
« Reply #604 on: March 12, 2011, 10:48:51 PM »
How does one become a Hidden User?  I feel like I only understand about 18% of how the boards work.

Bondo

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 23082
Re: meta
« Reply #605 on: March 12, 2011, 10:53:42 PM »
Profile->Account Related Settings->Uncheck "Show others your online status?"

smirnoff

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 26251
    • smirnoff's Top 100
Re: meta
« Reply #606 on: March 12, 2011, 11:15:26 PM »
You need to be audited, Bondo. *flieger gets his E-meter*

LOL :)

1SO

  • FAB
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 36128
  • Marathon Man
Re: meta
« Reply #607 on: April 25, 2011, 12:12:26 AM »
I don't know when or why I switched to Letter Grades when rating movies. I actually don't like letter grades. In college I created perfectly workable guidelines for a 5 Star Rating System and I used that system for 15 years. So why am I stuck on Letter Grades now?

FroHam X

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 17792
  • “By any seeds necessary.”
    • justAtad
Re: meta
« Reply #608 on: April 25, 2011, 12:19:33 AM »
You should use my system of not rating. It's pointless.
"We didn't clean the hamster's cage, the hamster's cage cleaned us!"

Can't get enough FroHam? Read more of my musings at justAtad

Junior

  • Bert Macklin, FBI
  • Global Moderator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 28709
  • What's the rumpus?
    • Benefits of a Classical Education
Re: meta
« Reply #609 on: April 25, 2011, 12:22:34 AM »
It probably has something to do with the lack of Asuperplusses in star ratings.
Check out my blog of many topics

“I’m not a quitter, Kimmy! I watched Interstellar all the way to the end!”