Citing this as proof that the process was rigged or changed the outcome of the primary is laughable to me. In never cites any actual action or decision that would have affected a single vote, much less effected a 20% swing.
I wish it had a bit more on the finances side of things because everything else I've seen is that Clinton did far more fundraising for downballot candidates than Sanders (who we should point out also had a joint fundraising agreement). The article provides very little clarity on this point. She likely helped them fundraise directly more than Sanders, EVEN if her joint fundraising wasn't making it to the states like it was supposed to.
But I do buy the general aspect of incompetence and inefficiency at the DNC.
I'm gonna be so annoyed if Sanders runs again in 2020. We need to stop with the freaking baby boomers.
ETA: Had time to read more about this and it is straight hit job on Clinton. Completely misrepresented what happened.