Follow Filmspotting on Twitter and Facebook
Total Members Voted: 216
Quote from: jokernick on April 08, 2010, 02:28:32 PMQuote from: tinyholidays on March 26, 2010, 10:04:34 AMI finally voted. Back to the Future. Christopher Lloyd is better than no Christopher Lloyd.that makes no sense... thats like saying "cancer is better then no cancer"NO IT"S NOT
Quote from: tinyholidays on March 26, 2010, 10:04:34 AMI finally voted. Back to the Future. Christopher Lloyd is better than no Christopher Lloyd.that makes no sense... thats like saying "cancer is better then no cancer"NO IT"S NOT
I finally voted. Back to the Future. Christopher Lloyd is better than no Christopher Lloyd.
No Carl Winslow is better than Carl Winslow.
Back to the Future doesn't have exploding helicopters. Therefore, Die Hard FTW!
Quote from: Chicago At Night on May 04, 2010, 09:27:27 PMBack to the Future doesn't have exploding helicopters. Therefore, Die Hard FTW!Time Travel > Exploding Helicopters
Quote from: tinyholidays on May 04, 2010, 10:31:32 PMQuote from: Chicago At Night on May 04, 2010, 09:27:27 PMBack to the Future doesn't have exploding helicopters. Therefore, Die Hard FTW!Time Travel > Exploding HelicoptersMachine-Gunless Santa > Time Travel