Author Topic: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts  (Read 561526 times)

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 34237
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #330 on: February 09, 2009, 02:34:48 AM »
I mean, FifthCityMuse made a strong case already ... unfortunately, it just didn't match my experience with the film much at all.

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 34237
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket - Verdicts
« Reply #331 on: February 09, 2009, 02:36:45 AM »
I haven't seen Eagle Shooting Horses but i'd be the first to champion the resurrection of Fong Sai Yuk 2. No disrespect to the verdict - It's just a really fun film to watch.

I'm all ears.  :)

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

roujin

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 15508
  • it's all research
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #332 on: February 09, 2009, 02:43:31 AM »
I mean, FifthCityMuse made a strong case already

Well, it's also been a while... and I am curious to see how it holds up.

pixote

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 34237
  • Up with generosity!
    • yet more inanities!
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #333 on: February 09, 2009, 02:44:13 AM »
I mean, FifthCityMuse made a strong case already

Well, it's also been a while... and I am curious to see how it holds up.

Rebels of the Neon God!

pixote
Great  |  Near Great  |  Very Good  |  Good  |  Fair  |  Mixed  |  Middling  |  Bad

FifthCityMuse

  • Elite Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3375
  • Good work, sycophants!
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #334 on: February 09, 2009, 05:58:56 AM »
I'm actually kinda glad it's gone... I mean, I still think it has some great stuff going on, but really, pix and edgar are right in the dialogue is reasonably clunky. I don't necessarily agree that plot is sacrificed, but I don't necessarily feel that it's going to be a massive loss to the bracket if this doesn't continue.

In fact, I would probably be more inclined to put Memories up for resurrection at the moment. The philosophical was certainly better handled in that.

edgar00

  • 00 Agent
  • Objectively Awesome
  • *
  • Posts: 12131
  • corndogs are better than Die Another Day
    • Between The Seats
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #335 on: February 09, 2009, 08:16:37 AM »
Sting of Death

Oguri is gifted at setting moods and tones.

Passage to Buddha

http://betweentheseats.blogspot.com/2009/02/review-passage-to-buddha.html

The story becomes a series of odd encounters with characters who share wisdom with the boy, and he begins to grow as a person and spiritually.
I think I'm going to like this Oguri fella.

As for Passage to Buddha, for a second there you're review conjured up images of Kikujiro.  I'm assuming Jang's film is a little better than that, right?  :)

At first glance, I missed the link to the longer review of this film at your blog.  Going to read that now...

pixote

Passage to Buddha is much better than Kikujiro. I enjoyed the mystical quality the film had. Like I mention on my blog, all this might have a lot to do with the fact that I was easily drawn in since I didn't know what anyone was talking about. It's not really the plot itself that matters by the end, but rather all these weird little encounters Son Je has had.

Sting of Death was pretty good, but it didn't knock my socks off. Sleeping Man, his other movie I watched for the bracket, was captivating from start to finish. This felt more linear. The narrative was fine, but nothing to shout about. It's all about performance and mood, both of which it did well.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 02:28:27 PM by edgarchaput »
-Le Chiffre: You changed your shirt, Mr Bond. I hope our little game isn't causing you to perspire.

-James Bond: A little. But I won't consider myself to be in trouble until I start weeping blood.

https://twitter.com/Betweentheseats
http://crabkeyheadquarters.wordpress.com/

Melvil

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 9977
  • Eek
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #336 on: February 09, 2009, 11:16:19 AM »
This is awesome. The resurrection forecasts are a lot of fun, thanks for taking the time to watch all of the losers. :D I wasn't around for the original verdicts on these, so going back and reading them first makes it even better.

worm@work

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 7445
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #337 on: February 09, 2009, 12:01:42 PM »
A Single Spark (Kwang-su Park, 1995)
vs.
Rainclouds over Wushan (Ming Zhang, 1996)


A Single Spark

So, this is essentially a biopic aout Jeon Tae-Il, a young labor activist who strove to unionize workers sufffering horrendous working conditions in Korean sweatshops and ultimately ended up immolating himself in protest of labor law violations. This really isn't a spoiler since its pretty much on the dvd cover.

What is nice about the film is that rather than being a straight-up biopic that simply chronicles Jeon Tae-Il's life, the story is told from the point of view of a young journalist / scholar / academic who is writing Chun's biography. This in turn structures the film along two separate time periods and allows us to contrast the past with the present. Plus, it lets the film do some interesting things (albeit not very original) like depicting the past in Black & White.

Seriously, I wanted to like this film so much. I really appreciate the intention here. I understand and appreciate the idea of chronicling the life of a man who seems to have been completely self-driven and who took the initiative to teach himself the labor laws (which seem to have been written in the Chinese script which most Koreans cannot read) and at a young age ended up sacrificing his life for a cause he truly believed in. Unfortunately, the film felt far too jingoistic to me. The dialogue came off as terribly didactic where it was always pointing out its political agenda. In an effort to really bring home the horror of the working conditions at the time, the filmmaker shows us the workers suffering from TB due to inadequate ventilation, the amphetamine injections to keep workers awake and so on. Secondly, the conversations at the secret meetings are just too poignant and idealistic. The villains are all evil ogres who don't think twice about beating up women and the heroes are all uniformly selfless and noble. This is not helped by the fact that I found some of the acting to be pretty sub-par, especially the actress who plays the journalist's young pregnant girlfriend. My problems with the dialogue could just be a case of poor translation too though (which I'm always afraid of while reviewing movies for this bracket).

This interlacing of two different time-periods lets the movie run a parallel track where the biographer and his girlfriend are also in a bunch of trouble for their own involvement in the labor movement. The idea here is to highlight how nothing has changed since Jeon Tae-il's death. Here again, this is done in a really obvious way. The couple is always being chased around by the police, being threatened, beaten up and so on. I really could've used a deeper examination of how despite changes in the regime or the laws underlying conditions remain the same or something along those lines.

My favorite parts were the black & white parts which are shot really beautifully and have a documentary-like feel to them. It helps that the story of Jeon Tae-il is inherently powerful and rousing.


The final shot of his self-immolation is striking to look at. I felt a pang of guilt for admiring the filmmaking in display when the scene being portrayed is such a tragic event. Anyway, so the film has a lot of memorable imagery that made it worthwhile for me. At the end of the film, thousands of people are thanked for contributing funds that went towards the making of the film. It's clear that Jeon Tae-Il is a hero and this is a part of Korea's history that people want to acknowledge and remember . As an outsider, however, I found the movie watchable and interesting but it really didn't blow me away.


Rainclouds Over Wushan

After recently watching and raving about Still Life and Up the Yangtze, I was skeptical about finding something new and interesting n yet another movie set in one of the villages that is soon to be submerged in service of the construction of the Three Gorges Dam. In a way, this is reminiscent of those films in that like both of those films, here again, we have parallel narratives where we follow three different protagonists. Initially, we are introduced Mai Qiang, a somewhat naive and lonely signal operator who is being visited by his more worldly friend, Ma Bing and his female friend Li Li. The beginning of the film is just these three people spending time at the isolated signal station, watching television even though there doesn't really seem to be anything to watch and trying to come up with ways to spend time. The pace is desultory and sluggish but it didn't bother me at all. I felt like it perfectly captured the way time seems to have come to a standstill in that town and the sense that everybody is just waiting for something that is about to happen (the flooding of the village in this case, I suppose). Then suddenly we go from these mostly indoor scenes to the outside world and get introduced to a single mother who works at a hotel in a nearby town. She is contemplating marriage and ends her affair with her boss which obviously doesn't leave him very happy. Somehow, out of seemingly no plot, a story starts to emerge and we finally meet the third protgonist, namely a cop, who comes in to investigate an alleged rape.

Zhang Ming just seems to have this amazing ability to paint this really vivid and intimate portrait of these people's lives in a really economic way. We don't get any backstory nor do we hear much exchange of dialogue but somehow the quiet desperation with which these people are living their lives comes across so clearly. In that sense, this movie felt like the antithesis of A Single Spark. Here, the director seems to almost want to avoid telling us what to think to an extent where I think some people may find the pace too slow or conclude that nothing really happens in this movie. I didn't feel that way at all. I found it incredibly powerful and tragic and poignant. The performances are all really good especially Xianmin Zhang who plays Mai Qiang and Ping Zhang, who plays the hotel receptionist.

I am not very good with suspense anyway. So yeah, this is exactly the kind of movie that I think I would never have discovered if it weren't for this bracket but that I know will stay with me for a long time to come. A Single Spark is definitely worth watching but Rainclouds over Wushan moves on easily.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 12:03:30 PM by worm@work »

Melvil

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 9977
  • Eek
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #338 on: February 09, 2009, 12:22:54 PM »
Excellent writeup, Worm. I have a feeling I would like Rainclouds, and probably agree with you on A Single Spark too. Cool that you discovered a new film here that has left an impact on you!

Thor

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6535
    • KTQ
Re: 1990s Far East Bracket: Verdicts
« Reply #339 on: February 09, 2009, 02:05:17 PM »
So many films I haven't seen but want to catch up with. Love this bracket.



I haven't seen Eagle Shooting Horses but i'd be the first to champion the resurrection of Fong Sai Yuk 2. No disrespect to the verdict - It's just a really fun film to watch.

I'm all ears.  :)

pixote

I've got nothing. FSY2 is really fun. The first one is better. If that survives, i'm happy.
Wanting for Thor what Thor wants for Thor.

 

love