A second round would be a huge amount of work and I'm not sure what would be gained from it. Also, it would mean using polls, which would actually dilute the graduation of the points scale I've devised. Not only that, but it eliminates the influence of higher rated directors because in a poll on the for it's not possible to have rankings, only multiple choices.
it would be more work but it wouldn't mean using polls. think of what the list is supposed to represent - does it represent the top 20 of a few people, or the top films of filmspotters in general? i do think the 11-30 scale addresses this problem a bit.
i'll take my ballot as example. of my top 20 films, i think 2 made it into the top 100, so my film tastes are arguable taken into little account for the filmspotter top 100. however, had we gone through a second round, i, and other outliers, would have taken into account our favorite of the top 150 or so and adjusted our "top 20" accordingly so that our relative tastes would be represented. i think most of the films would be the same, perhaps shuffle 20ish in and out, as well as some re-ordering, but having the second round better represents an overall sense of the film tastes on the boards.
if a second round appeals, but the workload doesn't, i'd be happy to help out in any capacity you see fit