Ok, I get it now. How many spots would that leave for consensus films, at this point?
just finished the post below, but currently 9. too many, not enough? like i said, i'm not fixed on the 256, though there is something calming about it
would it make sense to just include the top getters of consensus, whatever the remainder is come 3-list deadline?
I'm not sure what this means.
first, the implication is i love you. explicitly, folks were supposed to have their lists of 3 in by midnight tomorrow, i am wondering if it makes sens to have that as the deadline for voting on new consensus titles to include? if you think more time is needed i'm game. the second bit is that if no other folks decide to submit 3 lists (and i'm keeping the deadline to at least express interest, even though the titles won't need to come until after Project Consensus has wrapped), at this point that would mean that the 9 films that have the most interest in PC would get added; if another person submits a 3-list that would drop the consensus pool to only 6 films; if two more folks submit lists, then i'll scrap the 256 template, which won't be any great loss - likewise, if you think more than 6 or 9 films should be added from the CP. like i wrote earlier, i'm game to not stick with that, just a thought.
here is an update of the 3-list folks with the number of verdicts submitted (far east and us), thus in order that their lists will be added to the base:
verite 0
gman1050 3
THATguy 4
Bill Thompson 5
Thor 6
duder 8
ses593 10
smirnoff 18
skjerva 18
worm@work 21
roujin 22
pixote does it even matter? pixote's word is the last