love

Author Topic: Best of the Decade: General Discussion  (Read 51918 times)

Bondo

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 23082
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #260 on: May 07, 2010, 07:19:42 PM »
About a 1/3 of voters chose to use negative votes.  (18 of 57 = 32%)

Of those, almost all of them used 5 or fewer slots for negative votes.

 8)

No one could have guessed who would cause the almost in this statement.

chardy999

  • Elite Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #261 on: May 07, 2010, 09:32:38 PM »
About a 1/3 of voters chose to use negative votes.  (18 of 57 = 32%)

Of those, almost all of them used 5 or fewer slots for negative votes.

What was the maximum number of negative votes on a ballot?

pixote

20  (which means FLY didn't turn in a ballot after-all!)

After that comment about 5 or fewer, I thought I was a monty with 9!
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
- Groucho Marx

Tim

  • Elite Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2399
  • Be excellent to each other
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #262 on: May 07, 2010, 10:29:53 PM »
are you going to announce the 5 films with the most negative votes?
"Only cinema narrows its concern down to its content, that is to its story. It should, instead, concern itself with its form, its structure." Peter Greenaway

maņana

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 20862
  • Check your public library
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #263 on: May 10, 2010, 12:33:06 AM »
Had I done negative votes Before Sunset, Juno, and (500) Days of Summer would have been the top contenders. I might have also considered The 40-Year-Old Virgin, The Queen, or Pan's Labyrinth.
There's no deceit in the cauliflower.

Clovis8

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 11719
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #264 on: May 10, 2010, 12:36:37 AM »
Had I done negative votes Before Sunset

 ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

 :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[

maņana

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 20862
  • Check your public library
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #265 on: May 10, 2010, 12:37:22 AM »
I'm pretty sure we've talked about this before.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2010, 12:45:30 AM by matt the movie watcher »
There's no deceit in the cauliflower.

Clovis8

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 11719
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #266 on: May 10, 2010, 12:38:32 AM »
I'm pretty we've talked about this before.

I've programmed myself to instantly forget any negative talk about this film. It took years of meditation and 3 surgeries.  ;)

maņana

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 20862
  • Check your public library
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #267 on: May 10, 2010, 12:45:43 AM »
 :)
There's no deceit in the cauliflower.

roujin

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 15508
  • it's all research
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #268 on: May 10, 2010, 12:46:10 AM »
Hmmm, if I had used negative votes they've might gone toward the following films: A Serious Man, Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, Gladiator, Grizzly Man, Hot Fuzz, Inglourious Basterds, Let The Right One In, Any Lord of the Rings, Once, Shaun of the Dead, Slumdog Millionaire, United 93.

maņana

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 20862
  • Check your public library
Re: Best of the Decade: General Discussion
« Reply #269 on: May 10, 2010, 12:47:42 AM »
Any Lord of the Rings,
Yeah, I knew I was forgetting something.
There's no deceit in the cauliflower.

 

love