Author Topic: 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments  (Read 32962 times)

Senor Javi

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #20 on: August 02, 2010, 08:46:20 PM »
I'd done with my list after much toiling. Unfortunately, the number of movies that I felt were Top 100 ending up being 175 and since I like big, round numbers I threw in another 25 so as to torture myself into making a Top 200. I'll do screens for the first 100 and then list the other 100 in a more sensible way. As a little teaser, number 158 is Letter from an Unknown Woman (1958), so do with that information what you will.
My Switchboard - Movies Watched in 2010, The Year So Far, Top 200 Films, and more!

smirnoff

  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 23341
    • smirnoff's Top 100
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #21 on: August 03, 2010, 11:39:16 AM »
Here's the first draft of my top 28.



Been moving the x's around trying to see what feels right...

íKeith!

  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 26629
  • Bitch, I been around since LimeWire.
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #22 on: August 03, 2010, 11:43:38 AM »
uber-duper will be my new catch phrase.

Mike Shutt

  • Godfather
  • ******
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #23 on: August 03, 2010, 12:12:15 PM »
Would something like Kill Bill be considered one film because it was originally intended for that, or would I have to split up volumes 1 and 2?
Editor at Reel Projection
Podcaster at No Excuses

Beavermoose

  • Elite Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Samsonite! I was way off!
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #24 on: August 03, 2010, 01:37:26 PM »
Would something like Kill Bill be considered one film because it was originally intended for that, or would I have to split up volumes 1 and 2?

I think they were two separate films on last years list.

Mike Shutt

  • Godfather
  • ******
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #25 on: August 03, 2010, 01:40:54 PM »
Would something like Kill Bill be considered one film because it was originally intended for that, or would I have to split up volumes 1 and 2?

I think they were two separate films on last years list.

I still think it should be counted as one.
Editor at Reel Projection
Podcaster at No Excuses

Bill Thompson

  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 17562
  • DOOM!!!!
    • Bill's Movie Emporium
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #26 on: August 03, 2010, 04:23:16 PM »
Would something like Kill Bill be considered one film because it was originally intended for that, or would I have to split up volumes 1 and 2?

I think they were two separate films on last years list.

I still think it should be counted as one.

They were released as and thus are separate films and should be viewed/counted as separate films in my opinion, yo.

Wilson

  • Elite Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #27 on: August 03, 2010, 04:57:23 PM »
Absolutely seperate films.

Jared

  • Elite Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3463
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #28 on: August 03, 2010, 05:10:06 PM »
different films. you could even argue different genre  :)

Mike Shutt

  • Godfather
  • ******
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: The 3rd Annual Filmspotters Top 100 - Comments thread
« Reply #29 on: August 03, 2010, 05:19:16 PM »
Even if it was written and filmed as one movie and not split up until after all that for marketing?
Editor at Reel Projection
Podcaster at No Excuses