Author Topic: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion  (Read 15505 times)

ses

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 14970
    • Sarah's Kitchen Adventures
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #30 on: September 10, 2010, 08:43:18 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?
"It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"

http://sarahskitchenadventures.blogspot.com/

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #31 on: September 10, 2010, 09:14:48 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?

We don't discriminate here.

ses

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 14970
    • Sarah's Kitchen Adventures
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #32 on: September 10, 2010, 09:55:46 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?

We don't discriminate here.

How is that discrimination?
"It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"

http://sarahskitchenadventures.blogspot.com/

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #33 on: September 10, 2010, 09:58:44 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?

We don't discriminate here.

How is that discrimination?

It's not....I just don't think they should be split up.

ses

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 14970
    • Sarah's Kitchen Adventures
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #34 on: September 10, 2010, 10:09:13 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?

We don't discriminate here.

How is that discrimination?



It's not....I just don't think they should be split up.

It's your show.
"It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"

http://sarahskitchenadventures.blogspot.com/

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #35 on: September 10, 2010, 10:11:12 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?

We don't discriminate here.

How is that discrimination?



It's not....I just don't think they should be split up.

It's your show.

I mean, a performer is a performer. Gender should not matter.

FLYmeatwad

  • An Acronym
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 28328
  • I am trying to impress myself. I have yet to do it
    • Processed Grass
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #36 on: September 10, 2010, 10:12:14 PM »
Does anyone else think there should be separate male and female lists? Or is that just me?

We don't discriminate here.

How is that discrimination?



It's not....I just don't think they should be split up.

It's your show.

I mean, a performer is a performer. Gender should not matter.

Indeed. FLY has your back on this one, GC151.

ses

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 14970
    • Sarah's Kitchen Adventures
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #37 on: September 10, 2010, 10:56:04 PM »
That really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered.  No big deal.
"It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"

http://sarahskitchenadventures.blogspot.com/

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #38 on: September 11, 2010, 07:49:52 AM »
That really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered.  No big deal.

Oh I see. I'm sorry I misinterpreted it. I still think that one top 100 would be better because it puts less stress onto the list maker.

chardy999

  • Elite Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #39 on: September 11, 2010, 11:34:08 AM »
That really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered.  No big deal.

Oh I see. I'm sorry I misinterpreted it. I still think that one top 100 would be better because it puts less stress onto the list maker.

I kinda disagree but probably because i'm predisposed to agree with ses.

Regardless, this will be a difficult task.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
- Groucho Marx