Follow Filmspotting on Twitter and Facebook
Quote from: GothamCity151 on September 11, 2010, 07:49:52 AMQuote from: ses593 on September 10, 2010, 10:56:04 PMThat really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered. No big deal. Oh I see. I'm sorry I misinterpreted it. I still think that one top 100 would be better because it puts less stress onto the list maker.I kinda disagree but probably because i'm predisposed to agree with ses.Regardless, this will be a difficult task.
Quote from: ses593 on September 10, 2010, 10:56:04 PMThat really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered. No big deal. Oh I see. I'm sorry I misinterpreted it. I still think that one top 100 would be better because it puts less stress onto the list maker.
That really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered. No big deal.
Quote from: chardy999 on September 11, 2010, 11:34:08 AMQuote from: GothamCity151 on September 11, 2010, 07:49:52 AMQuote from: ses593 on September 10, 2010, 10:56:04 PMThat really wasn't my point, if we did separate lists, we could get more performers on each list, I wasn't trying to insinuate gender mattered. No big deal. Oh I see. I'm sorry I misinterpreted it. I still think that one top 100 would be better because it puts less stress onto the list maker.I kinda disagree but probably because i'm predisposed to agree with ses.Regardless, this will be a difficult task.Just because it is difficult does not mean it won't be fun.
I kinda disagree but probably because i'm predisposed to agree with ses.
I know who I have as my number 1.You're Tearing Me Apart, Lisa!