Author Topic: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion  (Read 14734 times)

Verite

  • Elite Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4431
  • Stay gold.
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #50 on: November 09, 2010, 06:41:37 PM »
Wow. Directors, Nov. 30th; performances, Dec. 1.  That's hell for a procrastinator like me.  Not to mention wanting to make pretty lists for both.
"When in doubt, seduce."
                   -Elaine May

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #51 on: November 09, 2010, 07:43:42 PM »
Wow. Directors, Nov. 30th; performances, Dec. 1.  That's hell for a procrastinator like me.  Not to mention wanting to make pretty lists for both.

It is still quite a bit of time. Don't procrastinate.

maņana

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 20863
  • Check your public library
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #52 on: November 09, 2010, 08:26:47 PM »
Did you just push the deadline up?  :o
There's no deceit in the cauliflower.

ses

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 14968
    • Sarah's Kitchen Adventures
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #53 on: November 09, 2010, 08:37:40 PM »
Why did you push the date up GC?
"It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"

http://sarahskitchenadventures.blogspot.com/

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #54 on: November 09, 2010, 08:42:57 PM »
Why did you push the date up GC?

Because things that are going on at that time in my life, I would not be able to put together and tabulate the list. The sooner the better. I am sorry if it is a slight inconvenience, but it had to be done. Sorry.

ses

  • Administrator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 14968
    • Sarah's Kitchen Adventures
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #55 on: November 09, 2010, 08:44:45 PM »
Why did you push the date up GC?

Because things that are going on at that time in my life, I would not be able to put together and tabulate the list. The sooner the better. I am sorry if it is a slight inconvenience, but it had to be done. Sorry.

I just worry about it being the day after another list is due.  You might miss out on some ballots that way.  How about postponing the submission date? Or maybe someone can help you with the tabulation.
"It's a fool who looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart"

http://sarahskitchenadventures.blogspot.com/

GothamCity151

  • Godfather
  • *****
  • Posts: 6495
  • Join us!
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #56 on: November 16, 2010, 09:27:53 AM »
Just a reminder that the ballots are due in 15 days. So far, I have only received five ballots. Be sure to get those in. Thanks!

smirnoff

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 25572
    • smirnoff's Top 100
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #57 on: November 16, 2010, 09:32:20 AM »
I'm going to start jotting down potentials today.

smirnoff

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 25572
    • smirnoff's Top 100
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #58 on: November 18, 2010, 09:29:57 AM »
How are we handling performances that span multiple movies? Sigourney Weaver in the Alien series for example...

Bondo

  • Objectively Awesome
  • ******
  • Posts: 21837
Re: Filmspotters' Top 100 Performances: Discussion
« Reply #59 on: November 18, 2010, 09:34:57 AM »
How are we handling performances that span multiple movies? Sigourney Weaver in the Alien series for example...

You can vote for roles rather than films.