Author Topic: Respond to the last movie you watched (Jan 2011 - Nov 2013)  (Read 1354652 times)


  • Elite Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2762
    • The Velvet Café
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18460 on: May 17, 2013, 01:55:35 AM »
Endearing time travelling with only natural sweeteners

In food labelling, they always list the ingredients after how much there is of it in the product. (You might want to think twice before informing yourself. Do you really want to know that sugar is the second biggest ingredient in your favourite müsli?)

For some movies the genre declaration at IMDb works the same way, and this is the case of Safety Not Guaranteed. Comedy, romance and science fiction, in that order. But the science fiction part is small, just an added touch of flavour.

You might think there would have been more of it, considering it’s a movie about time-travelling. There’s this man who claims that he has built a machine that helps you go back in time. When he advertises for a partner to go with him, this catches the attention of a magazine, which decides to write an article about him. A team is sent out to hunt him down, convinced that he’s either a fraud or crazy. The main story is about the developments between one of the team members and the man with the time machine, but there are also a couple of unrelated side stories about what her co-workers are up to while she’s doing the tracking.

What the stories have in common is that all of them are about the necessity of taking a leap of faith once in a while in your life. With no leaps of faith, you won’t get laid, you can’t fall in love and you’ll never get to travel in time.

Natural sweeteners
I really loved this little film. It’s kind of sweet and endearing, but never overly so. I think they’ve only used natural sweeteners, no artificial ones. It’s yet another example of how good the writing means a great deal more for the end result than the size of the budget.

Sometimes movies about journeys in time can make your brain fry as you’re struggling to keep up with the timelines, as in the case of Primer, where I had no clue at all about what was going on. This movie is a lot easier in that aspect, but managed to give my mind at least a little bit of tickling, enough to make me wake up at 2.30 in the night with a snap: “wait here, so THAT’S what happened, of course!”

The insight made me giggle and I had to suppress an impulse to wake up my daughter who had watched it with me to share my findings. When I told her the next morning, she agreed on my conclusion about the movie, but even more on my decision to let her sleep.

The question is: did I? What if I had made a time machine…?

Safety Not Guaranteed (Colin Trevorrov, US 2012) My rating: 4/5  - where I think aloud about movies

Sam the Cinema Snob

  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 24616
  • A Monkey with a Gun
    • Creative Criticism
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18461 on: May 17, 2013, 09:45:25 AM »
The Mortal Storm
Glad you watched this one. It's one of Borzage's best, but then most of them are pretty great!


  • Bert Macklin, FBI
  • Global Moderator
  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 28156
  • What's the rumpus?
    • Benefits of a Classical Education
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18462 on: May 17, 2013, 11:53:12 AM »
The Mortal Storm
Glad you watched this one. It's one of Borzage's best, but then most of them are pretty great!

Word. Another movie ending in snow. Nothing better.
Check out my blog of many topics

“I’m not a quitter, Kimmy! I watched Interstellar all the way to the end!”


  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 25121
    • smirnoff's Top 100
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18463 on: May 17, 2013, 04:51:21 PM »
Continuing the Lethal Weapon conversation...

Probably because it's only like 15 seconds long. :)

I like your "spidey sense" analogy. I totally feel it, and in a scene like the exploding house I love it because you know something unexpected is about to happen, but you're still not expecting something on that scale.

I would like to take your instant kill one compliment further. Not only is there no cradle in arms death scene, it's Murtaugh who gets off the final terse line. "You got off easy, you son of a bitch!" That's a cold goodbye to a murder victim who was his friend when the film started.

Nice edge to that.

I haven't gotten to Tremors yet in my mini-reviews, but let me say I'm completely in your corner on the Bacon/Ward chemistry. They are a hoot and a half and the film is one of my most quoted. It's not the lines, it's the constantly brilliant delivery by everybody. "I got a goddamn plan!"

Very animated delivery :))

I'm glad you don't plan to wait too long for Lethal Weapon 2. It addresses some of your concerns. That being said, there are two things I am very nervous about, one of those being Joe Pesci's performance. I loved it, but he so beat it into the ground afterwards it made me retroactively hate him when I go back to 2. Be sure to post when you watch it, because I will revisit it as well. A nice warm-up to our Resident Evil Marathon perhaps?

Yeah, that's sounds about right. :)

I've seen Pesci in exactly 4 films. Three were by Scorsese and the other was Home Alone. He's been a positive asset in each. Hopefully they don't over-use him here.


  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 863
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18464 on: May 17, 2013, 11:25:16 PM »

.... And my imagination

Jurassic Park (1993) Steven Spielberg - Every time I watch this film I worry that this will be the instance it slips from the number one spot on my all time list. Then we get to the first dinosaur reveal with the Brachiosaurus and I'm smiling like I was the first time I saw it at age 10 and know that it's position is safe. Getting to see it in Imax (and 3D which along with being my first 3D film didn't really make a significant difference in my opinion) was incredible. The T-Rex attack was as hair raising as ever and the Tyrannosaurus roar sent chills down my spine accompanied with a surprising amount of anxiety for a scene I've seen countless times. Almost precisely twenty years since my initial viewing(and who knows how many in between) 29 year old me got to spend two hours in the shoes of the 10 year old boy who was utterly floored the first time I visited Jurassic Park.

~You never say, "I'm gonna fight you, Steve." You just smile and act natural, and then you sucker-punch him~


  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 20804
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18465 on: May 17, 2013, 11:46:30 PM »
That is basically my review only I had turned 30 by the time I saw the 3D re-release ;D


  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • Hi there! Feed me worlds!
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18466 on: May 18, 2013, 09:55:53 AM »
Man on the Moon

Man on the Moon is the biopic of a freak.  Jim Carey seems like a great choice to play Andy Kaufman, but it is clear that while Jim Carey is interested in, and is generally talented in, entertaining others, Andy Kaufman was primarily only interested in entertaining himself (or at least that's how the movie portrays him).

I remember a lot of these stunts Andy Kaufman presented: The inter-gender wrestling champion, the Elvis skit, and, of course, Latka.  So I already knew Kaufman as a freak of nature.  But this movie's portrayal of Kaufman blew my mind.

The movie in done entertainingly, beginning with the breaking of the fourth wall and moving on from there. It would be a pretty traditional biopic, if Kaufman weren't such a unique individual.  But some of the choices they made for casting was just brilliant.  When I saw Danny Devito, (who played with Kaufman in Taxi, and the duo provided some of the show's stellar moments), playing his agent speaking to Jim Carey playing Kaufman, it was brilliant.  The script pulls a couple surprises, leaving us wondering what is real and what isn't.  Events happened, but what was really the motivation, what was really playacting?

In the end, with some of the twists, I was reminded of the film American Splendor, which I consider a better film, but Man on the Moon still has some great moments.  4/5
"It's not art unless it has the potential to be a disaster." Bansky


  • An Acronym
  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 27296
  • I am trying to impress myself. I have yet to do it
    • Processed Grass
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18467 on: May 18, 2013, 10:11:22 AM »
Doesn't happen often, but I shall compliment Spielberg's work: Jurassic Park is a good film.


  • Objectively Awesome
  • *****
  • Posts: 16493
  • Oo-da-lolly, Oo-da-lolly, golly what a day!
    • Corndog Chats
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18468 on: May 18, 2013, 04:19:34 PM »
I really like Milos Forman, but I have never gotten around to Man on the Moon. Always been curious. One day.
"Time is the speed at which the past decays."


  • Elite Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3779
Re: Respond to the last movie you watched
« Reply #18469 on: May 18, 2013, 05:12:15 PM »
Jurassic Park does seem to hold up with re-watches.

And I also echo the sentiment about each and every character in The Mortal Storm having strengths and weakness. As you point out, oldkid, the film is yes, Anti-Nazi, but as you also say that even then it seems to go beyond just "good guys" and "bad guys" and gives everyone a point of view on the subjects and themes that exist in the story.
"Be yourself, unless you suck."- Joss Whedon

My Switchboard